5 Comments
User's avatar
Free in Florida's avatar

“….In October 2020, Kate Bingham, the Vaccine Tsar, said: ‘There’s going to be no vaccination of people under 18. It’s an adult-only vaccine, for people over 50, focusing on health workers and care home workers and the vulnerable.’….”

Also in October 2020, the Great Barrington Declaration came out in the U.S. Drs. Jay Bhattacharya (Stanford), Martin Kulldorff (Harvard), and Senetra Gupta (Oxford) put forth a similar idea - Protect the vulnerable and elderly because the virus was not going to be stopped and was not a big threat to healthy adults or children. The great majority did not listen.

There was a lot of information here in the U.S. that sent up so many red flags about not taking any of the jabs. But the media did its usual shoddy reporting and seemed more interested in hysteria and the clicks it would bring than asking questions that could have prevented all of this. Between the fear that engendered and governmental threats to medical licenses of physicians who questioned the “accepted protocol”, it was a perfect storm for exactly what happened.

I think you’re correct that we’ll find out even more than we currently know about this sordid ordeal but my question is - Will anyone really be held accountable for it? I have my doubts on that.

Kevin Wilson's avatar

Thanks for the excellent and brave work Ros that you and your fellow C19 vaccine sceptics have and continue to do. It has surely saved many lives as it has emboldened other C19 sceptics to spread the word to protect others. The whole C19 scam has yet to be properly “holed below the waterline” thanks to the complicit media, foreign billionaires with delusions of grandeur, and our corrupt and indifferent political system. History will much kinder to you, your collaborators and Kathy Gyngell who have brought vital information and given hope to many under siege by our eugenicist political culture!

LMS2's avatar

I do seriously wonder about the thinking of those people who pushed these damaging vaccines upon the population, especially upon children and pregnant women, even when they knew the possible and real serious side effects. Did they really believe that the benefits outweighed the downsides, the number of people whose health was damaged, or who died as a result of being given these vaccines?

I'm just so, so glad that TCW was around at the time, not merely asking the right questions, but the commenters sharing pertinent information, such as the cases of transverse myelitis in the clinical trial group.

I'm glad to say that none of my immediate family had the vaccine, and other members of the family that did, did not suffer any serious side effects.

I have one friend who was seriously affected by the AZ vaccine, which nearly killed her. The side effects were not as rare as the Establishment claimed. She's not been compensated for the health damage she suffered, but perhaps she can join in the legal case against AZ...

Crystal Johnson's avatar

Thank God for people like you Dr Ros for raising your head above the parapet and risking all to pursue the truth. We would be none the wiser without your important work. Now we need medics to stand up similarly with this abomination of a trial on young children with puberty blockers. What a wicked generation this is! Thank you again.

Graphite's avatar

"I remind readers that in 2020, a senior AstraZeneca executive, when justifying the government indemnity for their vaccine, said ‘This is a unique situation where we as a company simply cannot take the risk if in . . . four years the vaccine is showing side effects.’" That is shocking!!!

Thanks for posting Ros. Sad about the death of TCW... It's great to see some of you on here :-)